Here are some definitions from various learned sources:
Oxford English Dictionary Soundness of body: that condition in which its function is duly discharged.
Collins Dictionary The state of being bodily and mentally vigorous and free from disease.
World Health Organisation A state of complete physical, mental and social well-being.
Parsons The state of optimum capacity of an individual for the effective performance of valued tasks.
Rossdale The product of a harmonised relationship between man and his ecology.
Dubos A modus vivendi enabling men to achieve a rewarding and not too painful existence while they cope with an imperfect world.
Illich A process of adaptation. It is not the result of instinct, but of an autonomous yet culturally shaped reaction to socially created reality. It designates the ability to adapt to changing environments, to growing up and to ageing, to healing when damaged, to suffering and to the peaceful expectation of death. Health embraces the future as well, and therefore includes anguish and the inner resources to live with it.
It is easy to see how different these approaches are. Some stress an ideal state and others a more practical approach. Some focus on physical conditions and others have the widest possible perspectives.
Various researchers on the subject quite understandably express very different views, but it is increasingly accepted that health involves far more than simply physical and even mental well-being or the absence of disease. Vibrant health and terminal illness are the extremes of the spectrum but modern thinking increasingly stresses the need to be nearer the ‘vibrant health’ end than midway between the two.
This broader view of health sees it as a state in which the individual is energetic, integrated, productive and self-actualized. This begs all kinds of questions though about what a particular person’s ideas of fullness of life are for him or her. Obviously this sort of definition will vary from person to person and will depend on what individuals see as important in their lives. To some, physical wellness will be the most important part of their definition of health and to others psychological, emotional or spiritual factors will be of most value.
To some extent the way each of us defines health for ourselves depends on how we perceive illness. Some see illness as an intrinsic part of being a person-all human beings are destined to be ill in one way or another at some time in their lives-and to others it is only the way that we behave that makes us ill: perfect behaviour produces perfect health. The first group of people see health as a kind of battle and illness as some sort of evil spell that is put on mankind. This sort of thinking has very ancient roots going back to pre-Biblical times but it has been crystallized for Judaeo-Christian societies in the story of Adam and Eve. By going against the will of God, the story goes, they brought eternal suffering and illness on themselves. This line of thinking removes any personal responsibility for health because ill health becomes part of the divine plan for mankind and by definition can’t be influenced.
By now the reader will be able to see how difficult it is to define health and illness but it is essential to be aware of what we mean by these terms or we will not be able to think intelligently about prevention. Health and illness are not just personal matters though-they occur in a social setting and reflect a particular society’s values, traditions and structures. We shall see in the next section how different illnesses are dealt with in different cultures.
Of all the symptoms that people have, only a fraction are mentioned to other members of the family and even fewer are taken outside the family. Only a small proportion of all symptoms are taken to health professionals, so clearly there is a hidden mass of ‘disease’ which, like an iceberg, lies submerged within society. Illness usually starts in the family context and most diagnoses are made by people in their own homes, sometimes helped by family and friends. Often, professional help is sought in order to get reassurance that the diagnosis is correct, or to get a prescription for a drug. The health professional’s response is then relayed to the ‘social-medical advisory system’ of family and friends and action is taken that the person considers appropriate. At this stage the individual with the problem often comes to a different conclusion from that of the health professional-possibly because the individual has different perceptions of the problem and because he or she knows more about him or herself than the doctor does.
A subject that is very little discussed in medical circles but which is very important in this context is what makes an individual decide, on a particular day, to see a doctor, when the symptoms may have been present for some time without this decision being taken. In other words, few people in the illness iceberg see their doctors at the very first sign of illness, so what makes them go for professional help at a particular time? An understanding of this can often enable the doctor to get to the heart of the real problem very quickly.
*10/72/5*